Gold Medalist from IIMC, Shreya Pathak covers stories that matter most to the Indian and South Asian community in America. From breaking news and policy developments to diaspora life and culture, she brings credibility, clarity, and a passion for impactful journalism.
Child preparing masala chai for Cancer Council fundraiser at Asia91, promoting awareness and community support.
With the right mindset into reality you can turn one vision by developing a pioneering business idea. This line demonstrates the power of empathy and humanity, this exemplifies the story of a young chai champion of Australia, Prahar. The young boy Who raised dollar 5163 for the cancer council not just by breathing homemade masala Chai but more than that providing an supporting a living structure tailored for individuals battling cancer paragraph change
The generation has become added that to their phones and it is not just about Gen Z but also people from older generation. This is one of those problems that is not half solved by simply identifying it. Amid the difficult to break cycle comes a story which is a beacon of hope. The initiative started with the idea that a simple cup of Chai could tie people together and that child would ultimately support people who have lost their smile facing this life deadly disease.
The story began put the heart at the age of 5 when he watched Harry to meta his mother host cancer council biggest morning tea event and that was struck his mind and he understood then even he could support Cancer Research and patient services.
With determination in his heart he registered for Australia’s biggest morning tea event he reached out to the family and friends and ask them to encourage him to support his cause he also prepared a heartfelt speech that he gave at his father’s office explaining why he wanted to raise funds for cancer patients will stop the highlight of the campaign came when guests gathered on May 24 add 4th Kingsgrove Scout Hall to savour the authentic masala Chai wild country grouping for Prahar ‘s shared vision not be hard .
Prahar said he simply loved making tea for people and every compliment that came from it made him feel like a superstar. One of the most memorable movements of the event came when a single cup of his masala Chai was auctioned for an impressive 101 Australian dollars.
The now replaced lemonade stand tradition
Children in Western countries for generation have been encouraged to develop a sense of independence. One of the most iconic symbols of this culture is lemonade stand which might appear as a simple roadside stall but it was a child’s first lesson in entrepreneurship. Children have children used to set up small tables design poster calculate cost manage profits and they learned to talk with strangers over time.
The stands became more than a summer pastime but a base for young minds to learn business fundamentals “I want to be the boss t” these were the words of an 8 year old Flannery Partain who confidently declared while preparing to learn her lemonade stand during the American entrepreneurship initiative lemonade day.
The same spirit can be seen in the story of young desi entrepreneurs stop the now thriving chai stalls is India’s version of classic lemonade stand the spirit demonstrates and entrepreneurship is not restricted to geography and culture the story is a reminder that people grow and achieve incredible things when given the right support an age does not matter for that using that success to help others change their lives is even more interesting this story equals powerful message from the best selling book by William Kakamwaba” The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind” . In the book, Kakamwaba recounts how, as a teenager in rural Malawi, he taught himself engineering from library books and built a windmill from scrap materials to bring electricity and hope to his village during a devastating famine. His story became an international symbol of youthful ingenuity, resilience, and problem-solving.
In a world full of stories heard , written , spoken this story of a young boy felt deeper. This story is not about the lemonade , not the chai not the charity itself but because of the lessons it holds the conviction and willingness to create a change that is small yet meaningful.
The Karnataka government’s proposal to create a dedicated mechanism for Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) has sparked a wider debate about how Indian states engage with their overseas communities.
In recent weeks, overseas Kannadigas organisations have intensified their demand for a dedicated institution to handle the concerns of the state’s global diaspora. A delegation led by entrepreneur and philanthropist Dr. Ronald Colaco met Karnataka leaders and called for a separate ministry, secretariat and directorate to address issues ranging from welfare and legal assistance to investment facilitation and student support.
The discussion gained momentum after Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister D. K. Shivakumar announced plans to establish a dedicated NRI-focused government department aimed at strengthening engagement with overseas Kannadigas and attracting investment into the state. However, subsequent reports indicate that the government is still evaluating the proposal and examining whether a new department would overlap with existing agencies involved in investment promotion and administration. As a result, it remains unclear whether the final structure will be a full-fledged ministry, a department, a secretariat or another institutional arrangement.
The debate reflects a broader trend across India: states increasingly see their overseas populations not merely as emigrants sending remittances home, but as investors, skilled professionals, entrepreneurs and influential global networks.
What Karnataka Is Proposing
According to government announcements and diaspora representatives, the proposed NRI mechanism would focus on:
Grievance redressal for overseas Kannadigas.
Assistance in legal and property-related matters.
Support for overseas students and workers.
Emergency coordination during crises abroad.
Investment facilitation through a single-window system.
Stronger links between the state government and the global Kannadigas community.
Supporters argue that Karnataka, despite having one of India’s largest overseas professional communities, lacks a dedicated institutional framework comparable to those operating in several other states.
At the same time, the proposal appears to be evolving. While diaspora groups have demanded a separate ministry, government discussions have increasingly focused on the practical structure and whether existing departments can already perform some of these functions.
Other States Have Already Built Similar Institutions
Karnataka would not be the first state to create a dedicated diaspora-focused institution.
Kerala: India’s Most Developed NRI Model
The benchmark remains Kerala’s Non-Resident Keralites Affairs Department (NORKA), established in 1996 as the first state-level NRI department in India.
Over the years, NORKA has developed into a comprehensive system that includes:
Grievance redressal services.
Welfare programmes.
Insurance schemes.
Overseas recruitment support.
Assistance during emergencies.
Rehabilitation and entrepreneurship support for returning migrants.
Dedicated coordination with Indian missions and central government agencies.
Kerala has continued expanding these efforts. In recent years, it launched additional welfare and insurance initiatives for expatriate Malayalis and strengthened support systems for overseas workers and returnees.
Because of its institutional depth and longevity, NORKA is often cited as the model that other states seek to emulate.
Punjab: Focus on Legal and Property Issues
Punjab maintains a dedicated Department of NRI Affairs along with a State Commission for NRIs.
The department has historically concentrated on:
Property disputes involving overseas Punjabis.
Legal assistance.
Complaint redressal.
Coordination with police and district administrations.
Punjab’s model emerged largely because of the large Punjabi diaspora in countries such as Canada, the United Kingdom, the United States and Australia.
Rajasthan: The Newest Entrant
Rajasthan recently established the Department of Domestic and Overseas Rajasthani Affairs (DORA).
The department focuses on:
Engagement with overseas Rajasthanis.
Investment promotion.
Diaspora outreach.
Grievance handling.
Because the initiative is relatively new, it is still too early to assess its long-term effectiveness.
Other States
Several other states have diaspora-focused bodies, though not always full ministries or departments.
The structures differ significantly, but the common goal is to maintain stronger links with overseas communities.
Why Governments Want Dedicated NRI Institutions
Supporters of dedicated NRI departments argue that they serve practical administrative needs rather than purely political objectives.
Millions of Indians live and work abroad. Many encounter challenges involving:
Labour disputes.
Immigration issues.
Property conflicts.
Documentation problems.
Fraud and recruitment scams.
Emergency evacuations.
Repatriation after deaths or crises.
Because responsibility for these issues is often spread across multiple agencies, a dedicated department can act as a single point of contact.
Investment and Economic Benefits
States also view their diasporas as valuable economic partners.
NRIs frequently invest in:
Real estate.
Healthcare.
Education.
Startups.
Infrastructure projects.
A specialised institution can reduce bureaucratic hurdles and provide a single-window mechanism for investors.
For Karnataka in particular, this argument carries weight because many overseas Kannadigas work in technology, engineering, medicine and business sectors that align closely with the state’s economic priorities.
Emergency Response
Events such as the COVID-19 pandemic, conflicts in West Asia and sudden labour crises have demonstrated the importance of organised communication channels between governments and overseas citizens.
Departments like NORKA have often played an important role during such emergencies by coordinating with Indian embassies and helping affected expatriates.
The Limits of State-Level NRI Departments
Despite their benefits, such institutions face significant limitations.
Foreign affairs remain the exclusive responsibility of the Union government.
State governments cannot:
Issue visas.
Conduct diplomacy.
Negotiate with foreign governments.
Directly intervene in immigration policies.
As a result, state NRI departments largely function as coordination and facilitation bodies.
Another challenge is administrative overlap. Many of the functions proposed for NRI departments are already handled by investment agencies, labour departments, revenue authorities, police departments or the Ministry of External Affairs.
This concern appears to be one reason Karnataka is reviewing its proposal before making a final decision.
Are NRIs Becoming a Political Constituency?
The Karnataka debate also raises a broader political question.
Traditionally, NRIs were viewed primarily through the lens of remittances and economic contributions. Today, they are increasingly recognised as influential global communities with financial resources, professional networks and significant social influence.
Although most overseas Indians cannot easily participate in elections without travelling to India, diaspora groups often influence public opinion through:
Community organisations.
Social media networks.
Business associations.
Philanthropic initiatives.
Political advocacy campaigns.
This has led some critics to question whether governments are creating NRI institutions primarily for welfare purposes or partly to cultivate influential support networks abroad.
Critics argue that if such departments are not carefully structured, they could evolve into:
Patronage networks.
Donation channels.
Elite lobbying platforms.
Preferential access systems for wealthy expatriates.
Supporters counter that these concerns should not overshadow the genuine administrative needs of millions of overseas Indians. They argue that transparency, independent oversight and clear accountability mechanisms can prevent misuse.
What Has the Central Government Done for NRIs?
The Union government has significantly expanded diaspora engagement over the past few years.
Key initiatives include:
Expansion of digital consular services.
Continued reforms under the e-Migrate system to protect overseas workers.
Pravasi Bharatiya Divas outreach programmes.
Increased focus on Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) services.
Measures to simplify investment and financial transactions for NRIs and OCIs.
Consular assistance and evacuation support during international crises.
The central government’s approach has generally focused on economic engagement, worker protection, cultural ties and strategic outreach rather than creating a separate political constituency.
A Test Case for the Future
Karnataka’s proposal comes at a time when states are increasingly competing for global capital, skilled professionals and diaspora engagement.
Whether the state eventually creates a ministry, department, secretariat or another institutional mechanism, the debate highlights a larger transformation in Indian governance.
Overseas Indians are no longer seen solely as remittance senders. They are increasingly viewed as investors, innovators, knowledge partners and global ambassadors for their home states.
The success of any future Karnataka NRI institution will ultimately depend on whether it delivers practical benefits—faster grievance redressal, better investment facilitation and stronger welfare support—or whether it becomes another layer of bureaucracy.
The larger question remains unresolved: are Indian states building these institutions because NRIs genuinely need them, or because overseas communities are becoming an increasingly valuable source of influence, funding and political capital?
The law banned it. Society simply found better ways to continue it.
Dowry may be one of India’s most successful illegal marketplaces.
It survives court judgments, police complaints, awareness campaigns, social media outrage, and generations of promises to change. Publicly, it is condemned. Privately, it continues to flourish. It is disguised as affection, justified as tradition, and defended as a social norm.
Every wedding album captures smiling faces, decorated mandaps, and celebrations of a new beginning. What it rarely captures are the negotiations that happened before the photographs were taken. The conversations hidden behind courtesy. The expectations disguised as gifts. The transactions wrapped in the language of culture.
The Dowry Prohibition Act stands tall in law books, yet dowry remains an uncomfortable reality in countless homes. What society calls a timeless tradition often shines like gold on the surface but leaves behind corrosion that destroys lives.
Society speaks the language of change. It posts about equality, condemns dowry, and celebrates progress. Yet behind the façade of what is often described as a timeless tradition exists a force that appears as lustrous as gold but ultimately leaves behind rust. What shines in public often destroys lives in private.
Dowry: A Market, Not a Tradition
Society talks about change, posts about equality, and frames dowry as wrong. Yet behind this façade exists a system that continues to operate with remarkable resilience.
The wedding album captures smiling faces of the bride and groom. The wedding bells signal a new journey. Families gather to celebrate a union. What the camera rarely captures, however, are the negotiations, expectations, and silent agreements that precede those celebrations.
The modern dowry conversation rarely begins with demands. It begins with statements such as: “Aapne hume apni beti de di, yahi toh sabse bada tohfa hai.” Yet somewhere between engagement and marriage, gratitude quietly transforms into expectation. “Ek gaadi mil jaati toh dono ke liye achha hota.”
A gesture becomes an obligation. A gift becomes an expectation. A suggestion becomes a demand.
This is where the insights of historian Veena Talwar become particularly relevant. In her book Dowry Murder, she argues that changes in status and property relations transformed what was once considered a daughter’s entitlement into a continuing burden imposed upon her family by the groom’s side.
The objects may have changed. The transaction has not.
When Saving a Marriage Becomes More Important Than Saving a Life
The cases of Deepika Nagar and Twisha Mehta do not appear isolated from this larger narrative. Their stories mirror one another with disturbing familiarity.
When a 24-year-old woman dies after falling from the third floor of the very home where she once dreamed of building her future, questions inevitably follow. Deepika Nagar’s family later alleged that she had faced harassment linked to dowry demands.
Perhaps the most troubling aspect of the case was not merely the allegation itself, but the reconciliation efforts that reportedly took place before her death. These attempts were presented as solutions intended to preserve a sacred marriage.
Beneath the language of reconciliation often lies an uncomfortable reality: adjustment becomes the responsibility of the woman’s family. Preserving the marriage becomes more important than examining the conditions under which that marriage survives.
The institution is protected. The individual bears the cost.
Twisha Mehta, a former Miss Pune who was found dead at her marital home on May 12, raises the concern reflected in Solicitor General Tushar Mehta’s statement: “A divorced daughter is better than a dead one.”
Voice Notes Buried Under ‘Log Kya Kahenge?’
“Mera jeevan narak ho gaya hai.”
A message reportedly sent by Twisha Mehta to her mother shortly before her death.
Why were her voice notes not heard? Why do families continue to believe things will improve? Why does society often treat divorce as a greater failure than suffering? Why do daughters continue to carry the burden of preserving marriages that are already breaking them?
The answers may change. The question remains the same: Why?
The Answer Beneath the Numbers
According to the National Crime Records Bureau, dowry-related crimes witnessed a 14 percent increase in 2023, with more than 15,000 registered cases nationwide and over 6,100 reported deaths in a single year.
Earlier studies paint an equally disturbing picture. Between 1999 and 2016, dowry deaths accounted for nearly 40 to 50 percent of all recorded female homicides annually in India.
As early as 1996, reports from the Indian Police Service documented more than 2,500 cases of bride-burning every year.
The methods evolve. The pattern remains. The faces change. The tragedy does not.
Premchand Saw the Problem Long Before We Did
Munshi Premchand was remarkably ahead of his time when he wrote Nirmala.
The novel explores a young woman who is married to a much older man because her family could not afford the expected dowry following her father’s death.
Dowry redistributes power. It determines who negotiates, who compromises, who carries fear, and who loses control over their future.
More than a century later, the questions raised by Nirmala remain painfully relevant.
Education Changed the Language of Dowry, Not the Practice
When Mary Wollstonecraft, in A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, advocated education as a means of empowering women and helping them build an identity of their own, she was arguing for agency.
Yet education and financial independence alone do not automatically liberate women from the expectations imposed by society, family, and marriage itself.
The cases of Deepika Nagar and Twisha Mehta challenge the assumption that modern education automatically dismantles patriarchal structures. They reveal that dowry has not disappeared in the face of modernity—it has adapted.
Dowry no longer speaks only the language of tradition. Increasingly, it speaks the language of status, prestige, family reputation, and social mobility.
“I do not wish women to have power over men; but over themselves.”
The tragedy of the dowry system persists because many women are educated enough to succeed in public life, yet are denied full control over their choices, fears, and futures within marriage.
Perhaps the greatest tragedy is that women are repeatedly asked to protect institutions that too often fail to protect them.
Conclusion
The real question is no longer whether dowry exists. The real question is why society continues to protect it.
The law may have outlawed dowry decades ago, but social acceptance continues to provide it shelter. It survives because it adapts.
Dowry was never merely a tradition. It was always a transaction—one disguised as culture, protected by silence, and sustained by social acceptance.
Until society becomes more concerned about protecting daughters than protecting appearances, the marketplace will remain open.
The law banned dowry decades ago. Society is still negotiating its price.
Skip to content 
